A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | $3.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $30.0M |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
The financial journey of A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge began with its theatrical debut in 1985. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around $3.0M. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately $30.0M. The film demonstrated remarkable staying power, drawing audiences consistently over its theatrical run.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (5.8/10), A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
Among the Horror offerings of 1985, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge earn at the box office?
A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge has grossed approximately $30.0M worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1985 report.
What was the production budget for A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge?
The reported production cost for A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge was roughly $3.0M, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of $30.0M against a budget of $3.0M, the film's rating is 5.8/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.