
Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | $724.8K |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.6M |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
The financial journey of Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde began with its theatrical debut in 1953. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around $724.8K. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately $2.6M. Such numbers indicate a resounding success, validating the production investment and marketing strategy.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (6.3/10), Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
Among the Comedy offerings of 1953, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde earn at the box office?
Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde has grossed approximately $2.6M worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1953 report.
What was the production budget for Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?
The reported production cost for Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was roughly $724.8K, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of $2.6M against a budget of $724.8K, the film's rating is 6.3/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.