Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
The financial journey of Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson began with its theatrical debut in 1992. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (0/10), Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
When compared to other Documentary releases of 1992, Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson stands as a testament to the volatile nature of the genre. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson earn at the box office?
Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1992 report.
What was the production budget for Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson?
The reported production cost for Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Boogie in Blue: Harry "The Hipster" Gibson a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 0/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.