Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | $16.8M |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.3M |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus, released in 2006, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around $16.8M. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately $2.3M. While it found an audience, the box office returns faced stiff competition from other releases.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (6.1/10), Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
As a representative of 2006's Drama, Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus offers a case study in how audience preferences are shifting. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus earn at the box office?
Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus has grossed approximately $2.3M worldwide as of our latest data updating this 2006 report.
What was the production budget for Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus?
The reported production cost for Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus was roughly $16.8M, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of $2.3M against a budget of $16.8M, the film's rating is 6.1/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.