Financial Breakdown

CategoryAmount (Approx)
Official Budget TBA
Worldwide Gross TBA
IMDb Rating★ 3.3 / 10
Advertisement

Detailed Financial Report

Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight, released in 1993, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.

Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The momentum at the ticket windows suggested a niche appeal rather than a broad mass-market breakout.

Profitability & Verdict

In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (3.3/10), Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.

Comparables

When compared to other Action releases of 1993, Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight stands as a testament to the volatile nature of the genre. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight earn at the box office?

Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1993 report.

What was the production budget for Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight?

The reported production cost for Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.

Is Invisible: The Chronicles of Benjamin Knight a box office hit or flop?

Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 3.3/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.