Financial Breakdown

CategoryAmount (Approx)
Official Budget TBA
Worldwide Gross TBA
IMDb Rating★ 2 / 10
Advertisement

Detailed Financial Report

The financial journey of Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu began with its theatrical debut in 1987. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.

Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.

Profitability & Verdict

In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (2/10), Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.

Comparables

As a representative of 1987's cinema, Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu offers a case study in how audience preferences are shifting. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu earn at the box office?

Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1987 report.

What was the production budget for Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu?

The reported production cost for Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.

Is Kobayashi Hitomi vs Takasugi Rei: Daburupettingu a box office hit or flop?

Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 2/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.