Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
With its release in 2010, Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV aimed to make a significant impact on the box office charts. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (4/10), Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
When compared to other History releases of 2010, Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV stands as a testament to the volatile nature of the genre. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV earn at the box office?
Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 2010 report.
What was the production budget for Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV?
The reported production cost for Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Mad and Bad: 60 Years of Science on TV a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 4/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.