
Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
With its release in 2004, Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! aimed to make a significant impact on the box office charts. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. While it found an audience, the box office returns faced stiff competition from other releases.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (1/10), Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
Among the Action offerings of 2004, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! earn at the box office?
Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 2004 report.
What was the production budget for Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János!?
The reported production cost for Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Nomen est Omen avagy Reszkess Szabó János! a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 1/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.