
Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
The financial journey of Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx began with its theatrical debut in 1970. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (4.2/10), Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
Among the Comedy offerings of 1970, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx earn at the box office?
Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1970 report.
What was the production budget for Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx?
The reported production cost for Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 4.2/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.