Rage of Angels: The Story Continues Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
Rage of Angels: The Story Continues, released in 1986, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Rage of Angels: The Story Continues has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. While it found an audience, the box office returns faced stiff competition from other releases.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (4.8/10), Rage of Angels: The Story Continues is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
When compared to other TV Movie releases of 1986, Rage of Angels: The Story Continues stands as a testament to the volatile nature of the genre. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Rage of Angels: The Story Continues earn at the box office?
Rage of Angels: The Story Continues has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1986 report.
What was the production budget for Rage of Angels: The Story Continues?
The reported production cost for Rage of Angels: The Story Continues was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Rage of Angels: The Story Continues a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 4.8/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.