Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking Box Office Collection, Budget & Verdict
Financial Breakdown
| Category | Amount (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Official Budget | TBA |
| Worldwide Gross | TBA |
| IMDb Rating | / 10 |
Detailed Financial Report
Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking, released in 1995, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.
Collection Trajectory
The box office journey for Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The momentum at the ticket windows suggested a niche appeal rather than a broad mass-market breakout.
Profitability & Verdict
In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (2/10), Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.
Comparables
Among the Drama offerings of 1995, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking earn at the box office?
Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1995 report.
What was the production budget for Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking?
The reported production cost for Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.
Is Raw Underwear in a White Coat, Thigh Licking a box office hit or flop?
Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 2/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.