Financial Breakdown

CategoryAmount (Approx)
Official Budget TBA
Worldwide Gross TBA
IMDb Rating★ 0 / 10
Advertisement

Detailed Financial Report

The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi, released in 2006, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.

Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.

Profitability & Verdict

In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (0/10), The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.

Comparables

Among the Documentary offerings of 2006, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi earn at the box office?

The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 2006 report.

What was the production budget for The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi?

The reported production cost for The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.

Is The Man with Two Names Cameraman Kim Hak-seong, Kanai Seiichi a box office hit or flop?

Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 0/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.