Financial Breakdown

CategoryAmount (Approx)
Official Budget TBA
Worldwide Gross TBA
IMDb Rating★ 0 / 10
Advertisement

Detailed Financial Report

Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns, released in 2011, entered the cinematic marketplace with the goal of capturing global audiences. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.

Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. While it found an audience, the box office returns faced stiff competition from other releases.

Profitability & Verdict

In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (0/10), Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.

Comparables

As a representative of 2011's Documentary, Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns offers a case study in how audience preferences are shifting. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns earn at the box office?

Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 2011 report.

What was the production budget for Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns?

The reported production cost for Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.

Is Why Green Lantern Matters: The Talent of Geoff Johns a box office hit or flop?

Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 0/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.