Is 2012: Supernova Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, 2012: Supernova is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:2012: Supernova is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, 2012: Supernova is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2009, 2012: Supernova emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two hundred years ago a supernova exploded somewhere in the Lyra constellation. Unlike standard genre fare, 2012: Supernova attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and 2012: Supernova features a noteworthy lineup led by Brian Krause . Supported by the likes of Najarra Townsend and Heather McComb , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of 2012: Supernova (2009) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: 2012: Supernova is a Action, Science Fiction film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: 2012: Supernova attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of 2012: Supernova reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:





Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
FlixFling
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel
Bloodstream
Amazon Video
FlixFling
Amazon Video
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.2/10, and global collection metrics, 2012: Supernova stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2009 cinematic year.
2012: Supernova is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.2/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.2/10, 2012: Supernova may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
2012: Supernova is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, fuboTV, FlixFling, Amazon Prime Video with Ads, Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel, Bloodstream depending on your region.
Wait, whoa, hold up...you mean this ISN'T a sequel to the John Cusack cheese-fest "2012?" Are you sure? Yes, because this monstrosity makes the original "2012" look like "Citizen Kane." Kelvin (the used-to-be talented Brian Krause) is the head of a team that looks to launch nuclear missiles into outer space to dissipate a giant supernova headed in Earth's direction. His wife (Heather McComb) and daughter (Najarra Townsend) run around in the desert, avoiding badly rendered computer animated special effects, as well as a supporting cast of dozens. Yup, that's the plot. The planet is on a collision course with a supernova, a few people get upset, the scientist characters bandy about terms like "magnetic shield" and "nuclear," do a lot of "recalculating" and "running simulations" on their computers...there's a ninja, I guess, who wants to stop this planet saving effort...a couple of Iranians are thrown in for good measure...ugh. The film was released by The Asylum, who would release terrible straight-to-video nightmares with titles that sounded vaguely like contemporary blockbusters in the theater. Have you been unlucky enough to see "Sinister Squad," "Independents' Day," "AVH: Alien vs. Hunter," or "Transmorphers?" Good, I wouldn't wish that on a Clinton. It's sad that a company has such low regard for their product (and audience) that they try to trick them into watching their rip-off film, instead of trying something original that would stand out in a crowded video and streaming landscape. The direction is terrible, the budget was about eight bucks, and all the performers look properly embarrassed. No one even tries to do a good job, I hope their paychecks were worth it. "2012: Supernova" is one of the worst films I have ever seen. I hope that's blunt enough for you. (1/2*) out of five stars. This is unrated and contains physical violence, mild gun violence, some profanity, mild sexual references, some adult situations, alcohol and tobacco use
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.