Is 23 Hours Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, 23 Hours is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Fantasy movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:23 Hours is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy genre.
Answer: Yes, 23 Hours is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Fantasy movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2024, 23 Hours emerges as a significant entry in the Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Manolo finds a mysterious object that transports him to an alternate reality of Puerto Rico. Unlike standard genre fare, 23 Hours attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Fantasy is often anchored by its ensemble, and 23 Hours features a noteworthy lineup led by Jeirmarie Osorio . Supported by the likes of Roy Sánchez-Vahamonde and Modesto Lacen , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of 23 Hours (2024) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: 23 Hours is a Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy film that transports viewers to imaginative worlds filled with magic, wonder, and epic adventures. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: 23 Hours concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to fantasy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of 23 Hours reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:


Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, 23 Hours stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2024 cinematic year.
23 Hours has received mixed reviews with a 6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
23 Hours is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy movies, but read reviews first.
23 Hours may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Movies about alternate realities and the multiverse have become increasingly common in recent years, as seen in films like “Everything Everywhere All at Once” (2022) and “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” (2022). And now the latest addition in this genre comes to us from Puerto Rico from writer-director Bruno Irizarry, a sci-fi comedy about a road construction worker, Manolo (Roy Sánchez-Vahamondes), who stumbles upon a fragment of a sacred Taíno medallion with magical powers lost centuries earlier in a remote location on the island, home of a mystical transcendental portal. In the process, he’s whisked away to an alternate version of reality, where he finds life very different from what he’s typically known. Fortunately, he finds much-needed help when he encounters a reality control field agent, Lorena (Jeirmarie Osorio), a newly assigned operative charged with reconciling discrepancies and anomalous conditions in various lines of probable existence (in this case, the stranger’s presence in a version of reality where he doesn’t belong). Together, this unlikely duo must work together to get him back to his indigenous existence before it’s too late, a challenge given that they only have 23 hours to accomplish this task. Nevertheless, even though Manolo is sorely out of his element, his deep knowledge as a sci-fi trivia geek makes him eminently qualified to work with his cohort to sort out his situation. And, simultaneously, this eye-opening and enlightening experience affords him valuable opportunities to learn important insights about his true self and the very nature of existence, including manifesting an idealized version of his island home. However, while the film spins a generally amusing and engaging yarn, its overall execution is somewhat uneven. Many elements, such as the picture’s decidedly quirky humor, work quite well, but, at times, it can spill over into overblown slapstickish silliness, an unfortunate tendency that undercuts the inspired wit used to carry much of the story. Moreover, various aspects of the narrative seem wholly extraneous, while others are left only partially (or, in some cases even, completely) unexplained, weakening the production’s credibility in imparting some genuinely useful theoretical knowledge about the nature of the multiverse. The result is a project that, though commendable, still feels like it should have gone through an additional round or two of script revisions, along with some refinement in the film editing. That aside, however, diehard sci-fi fans are sure to appreciate the picture’s many nods to iconic movie and TV offerings, especially those mentioned above, as well as the “The Matrix,” “Star Trek” and “Back to the Future” franchises, as well as its inventive special effects. Enjoy this one for what it’s worth, despite its room for improvement.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.