Is A Bullet for Joey Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, A Bullet for Joey is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:A Bullet for Joey is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, A Bullet for Joey is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1955, A Bullet for Joey emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Raoul Leduc is a police inspector trailing a spy who plots to kidnap an important American atomic scientist. Unlike standard genre fare, A Bullet for Joey attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and A Bullet for Joey features a noteworthy lineup led by Edward G. Robinson . Supported by the likes of George Raft and Audrey Totter , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of A Bullet for Joey (1955) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: A Bullet for Joey is a Crime, Thriller film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: A Bullet for Joey attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of A Bullet for Joey reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
A Bullet for Joey incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, thriller film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: A Bullet for Joey adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, A Bullet for Joey stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1955 cinematic year.
A Bullet for Joey has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
A Bullet for Joey is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
A Bullet for Joey may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
“Joey” (George Raft) arrives in Canada tasked with kidnapping a nuclear scientist on behalf of his nefarious principles. What he finds when he arrives is a rather messy state of affairs as there are already corpses mounting up and that’s attracted the attention of the RCMP’s finest inspector “Leduc” (Edward G. Robinson) who knows that the only thing connecting the deaths so far is the professor “Macklin” (George Dolenz). “Joey” re-assembles his old gang and that includes his ex “Joyce” (Audrey Totter) who is to try a more persuasive approach with the scientist - but one way or the other they are determined to get his secrets or himself. It’s got a bit of an Cold War edge to it, this drama, and as the story develops we can see that the villain of the piece isn’t fully aware of the ramifications of his task, nor of it’s implications for the freedom loving nations of the world, and as the detective gets closer to tracking down who did what to whom and why, a crisis of conscience begins to trouble the unscrupulous gangster and that makes things way more perilous for just about everyone. There is not much jeopardy here and Raft is curiously underwhelming as the thrust of the plot is a little too contained by a more overt political message that rather dragged the story down. Totter also doesn’t really deliver anything substantial and it takes until very near the end before it livens up enough to get Robinson out of his office and into the people smuggling racket. It’s perfectly watchable but hasn’t quite the bite of the usual Raft/Robinson characterisations and falls a bit flat.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.