Is A Guilty Conscience Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, A Guilty Conscience is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 133 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:A Guilty Conscience is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Drama, Mystery genre.
Answer: Yes, A Guilty Conscience is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 133 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2023, A Guilty Conscience emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Drama, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of After his negligence causes an innocent woman to go to jail, a lawyer and his colleagues work to clear her name. Unlike standard genre fare, A Guilty Conscience attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and A Guilty Conscience features a noteworthy lineup led by Dayo Wong Chi-Wah . Supported by the likes of Louise Wong and Tse Kwan-Ho , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of A Guilty Conscience (2023) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: A Guilty Conscience is a Crime, Drama, Mystery film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: A Guilty Conscience concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of A Guilty Conscience reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
A Guilty Conscience incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, drama, mystery film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: A Guilty Conscience adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $2.8M |
| Worldwide Gross | $10.0M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for A Guilty Conscience is $2.8M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.6/10, and global collection metrics, A Guilty Conscience stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2023 cinematic year.
A Guilty Conscience has received mixed reviews with a 6.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
A Guilty Conscience is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Drama, Mystery movies, but read reviews first.
A Guilty Conscience may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
"Adrian Lam" (Dayo Wong) is a magistrate who doesn't really care about his job. He gets a bit of a shock, though, when his new boss sends him back to the benches where he must, again, actually practice law. It's here, after a night on the booze, that he turns up to defend a woman charged with the negligent homicide of her young son. A combination of his laziness, incompetence and his hangover leaves this woman hung out to dry when one of the witnesses - from whom he didn't get a written deposition - changes his story. Off to jail she goes and into a maelstrom of despair goes he before the guilt starts to kick in, and he decides to get his act together. His co-defending counsel "Evelyn" from the original trial (Renci Yeung) and he decide to try and convince the convicted "Jolene" (Louise Wong) to let them work on an appeal and the remainder of this rather flat courtroom drama follows their efforts. It starts off quite entertainingly, with a bit of a tetchy dynamic between the lawyers and to be fair, Dayo Wong is quite proficient as the bored and rather indolent lawyer. Sadly, though, once the ship is all upright again, the story becomes one of rather predicable family intrigue and power-broking that exposes us to many from a supporting cast that are as unremarkable as the dialogue. The photography has something of a television feature to it and the denouement, though quite lively paced - well you can see that coming from space. At 2¼ hours it is also far too long with just not enough meat on the story to sustain it. Perhaps a more judiciously cut edit and a few fewer side-stories might have made it more of a watchable "Perry Mason" style drama, but as it is - I was a bit bored by the end.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.