Is Admiral Ushakov Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Admiral Ushakov is definitely worth watching if you enjoy History movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Admiral Ushakov is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the History genre.
Answer: Yes, Admiral Ushakov is definitely worth watching if you enjoy History movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1953, Admiral Ushakov emerges as a significant entry in the History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Historical epic about the legendary Russian naval commander of the 18th century, admiral Fyodor Ushakov, and his fight for Crimea during the Russo-Turkish War. Unlike standard genre fare, Admiral Ushakov attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any History is often anchored by its ensemble, and Admiral Ushakov features a noteworthy lineup led by Ivan Pereverzev . Supported by the likes of Sergey Bondarchuk and Mikhail Pugovkin , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Admiral Ushakov (1953) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Admiral Ushakov is a History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Admiral Ushakov concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to history resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Admiral Ushakov reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Admiral Ushakov draws heavily from documented historical records. As a history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Admiral Ushakov adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:










Okko
Okko
OkkoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, Admiral Ushakov stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1953 cinematic year.
Admiral Ushakov has received mixed reviews with a 6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Admiral Ushakov is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of History movies, but read reviews first.
Admiral Ushakov is currently available for streaming on Okko. You can also check for it on platforms like Okko depending on your region.
I thought his had quite a few similarities to C.S. Forester's maritime adventure stories, although this is based on a real Russian sailor who helped expand the empire of Catherine the (not yet) Great. He has a position on her yacht when he encounters her favourite minister Potemkin (Boris Livanov) and asks him for a job. Not a desk job, but an actual job working on the construction of a new fleet. This impresses the count and so Ushakov (Ivan Pereverzev) finds himself drafted into more active service. He turns out to have quite a knack for strategy and as the Russian's face the internecine plotting of the French, the British and the Ottoman's, they have to think quickly and creatively if they are to avoid a crushing defeat. Though he does have the protection of Potemkin, this upstart officer is not without his powerful detractors who would see him at the bottom of the sea, or hanged, if it served their purpose. They all know that the favour of the Empress could be fickle, and so it was an eggshell walk for this man at the best of times! Aram Kachaturian has created a suitably rousing, swirling, score here and the period naval costume and wig departments have gone into top gear to present us with a fairly authentic looking action-packed adventure of sea power, back-stabbing and glory. It does take it's time to get us into the thick of the action, indeed at times it is a little too stage bound, but the last fifteen minutes are lively and full of pyrotechnics and high spirits. I wouldn't say the acting is great, no, but the two men heading the history do well enough and are well complemented by Sergey Bondarchuk's malevolent Prokoviev and by occasional appearances from Olga Zhivneva as a woman who knew well how usurping worked. Though a biopic of sorts, it takes a very rose-tinted, pro-Russian, view of the conflict - but then that expression about history and winners springs to mind.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise