Is Ambush at Cimarron Pass Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Ambush at Cimarron Pass is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 73 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Ambush at Cimarron Pass is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, War, Western genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Ambush at Cimarron Pass is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 73 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1958, Ambush at Cimarron Pass emerges as a significant entry in the Action, War, Western domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A small Army patrol unit and a couple of former Confederates reluctantly throw in their lot together after being attacked by a band of Native Americans. Unlike standard genre fare, Ambush at Cimarron Pass attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Ambush at Cimarron Pass features a noteworthy lineup led by Scott Brady . Supported by the likes of Margia Dean and Clint Eastwood , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Ambush at Cimarron Pass (1958) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Ambush at Cimarron Pass is a Action, War, Western film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Ambush at Cimarron Pass attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Ambush at Cimarron Pass reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Ambush at Cimarron Pass uses real-world events as narrative inspiration. As a action, war, western film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Ambush at Cimarron Pass adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.3/10, and global collection metrics, Ambush at Cimarron Pass stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1958 cinematic year.
Ambush at Cimarron Pass has received mixed reviews with a 5.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Ambush at Cimarron Pass is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, War, Western movies, but read reviews first.
Ambush at Cimarron Pass may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
'Ambush at Cimarron Pass' is a bit of a bore. Even though I don't think it's as bad as one Clint Eastwood reportedly does, I do agree in the sense that this 1958 production is a limp effort at making a western. I found none of the characters to be likeable, not that they're necessarily unlikeable per se, and the events depicted onscreen failed to give me any form of entertainment/enjoyment. Eastwood is solid in arguably his biggest role at this point in time, though the rest of those alongside the aforementioned aren't noteworthy to me - at a big push, Scott Brady is the standout of the others. Eastwood didn't return to film acting after this until 1964, but arrived back with a bang with the start of the Dollars Trilogy - I look forward to watching those!
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.