Is Anna Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Anna is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Anna is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Anna is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1993, Anna emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Director Nikita Mikhalkov documents the history of Russia from 1980 to 1991 by annually asking his daughter Anna such questions as "What do you love the most?", "What scares you the most?", "What do you want above anything" and "What do you hate the most?". Unlike standard genre fare, Anna attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Anna features a noteworthy lineup led by Nikita Mikhalkov .
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Anna (1993) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Anna stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1993 cinematic year.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.