Is Arrowhead Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Arrowhead is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 105 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Arrowhead is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Western genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Arrowhead is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 105 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1953, Arrowhead emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Western domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Director Charles Marquis Warren's 1953 western stars Charlton Heston and Jack Palance. Unlike standard genre fare, Arrowhead attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Arrowhead features a noteworthy lineup led by Charlton Heston . Supported by the likes of Jack Palance and Katy Jurado , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Arrowhead (1953) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Arrowhead is a Action, Western film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Arrowhead attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Arrowhead reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, Arrowhead stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1953 cinematic year.
Arrowhead has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Arrowhead is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Western movies, but read reviews first.
Arrowhead may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Adobe Walls. Arrowhead, the mere mention of it in Western circles sometimes induces a sharp intake of breath, even a furrowed brow or two. Starring Charlton Heston and Jack Palance, directed by Charles Marquis Warren; who also adapts the screenplay from W.R. Burnett's novel, Adobe Walls, Arrowhead rewrites the Indian Wars and firmly paints the Apache as distrustful thugs. Based in essence on real life Indian scout, Al Seiber, with Heston in the role but named as Ed Bannon here, story is set in Texas 1878 at the Fort Clark cavalry post. Peace has been brokered and the good old cavalry boys have arranged for the Apache, led by a newly educated Toriano (Palance), to be dog tagged and whipped off to some arid land in Florida. However, the pesky Toriano has been plotting a revolution and is ready to lead his people in an all out assault on whitey and to hell with the treaty. Only white dude who smells a rat is Bannon, who with some Indian blood coursing through his veins, hates the Redskins and will never trust them. But the cavalry hate Bannon as well, because he is in the way, causing friction, a hindrance to their wonderful ideas for piece. No surprises for guessing what happens next! If Warren and the big wigs at Paramount Pictures were aware of the racist overtones here in 1953? Is cause for debate. I tend to agree with the theory that puts this as a sort of anti-communist allegory, but of course that doesn't excuse the xenophobic narrative whoever is on the receiving end! Yet surely the makers were genuine in trying to make a good old Cavalry versus Indians actioner? That the picture often meanders and is not carpeted with action, is a little moot, but it is well put together, well acted and looks nice with it's actual real Bracketville location filming (Ray Rennahan on cinematography). Paul Sawtell does one of his robust thematic musical scores, and fine acting support comes from Robert Wilkie and Brian Keith. It's a solid routine Oater, and can be enjoyed if you can forgive it its sins? Forgive them for they know not what they do...or something like that! 6/10
_**Grim cavalry vs. Apaches Western with Heston and Palance**_ Ed Bannon (Charlton Heston) is a no-nonsense scout at Fort Clark, Texas, who used to live with the Apaches. He is suspicious when the son of the chief, Toriano (Jack Palance), is returning from his education back East at the same time the Chiricahuas are meeting the U.S. Army. He solemnly warns that they will not peaceably be shipped off to Florida. Brian Keith plays the new commanding officer of the fort in his feature film debut. Katy Jurado and Mary Sinclair are also on hand. "Arrowhead" (1953) was based on W.R. Burnett’s novel wherein the author patterned Ed Bannon (Heston) after the real-life Albert Sieber. Meanwhile the film was shot at the actual Fort Clark in Brackettville, Texas. As such, it has some authenticity in its favor even while a bit marred by the dated style of its era. The problem is some people don’t want ugly reality, but rather political correctness. I don’t get what the problem is. Bannon is understandably cheerless in a tense life-or-death situation while the Chiricahuas are depicted as formidable warriors who are willing to fight to the death. The movie portrays the culmination of the Indian Wars (as far as the Apaches go) in a fictitious story backed by factual material and it’s not pleasant, but rather grim and brutal. It was the Indian _WARS_, after all, not the Indian love-in. The film runs 1 hour, 45 minutes. GRADE: B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.