Is Assault Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Assault is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 91 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Assault is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Drama, Horror, Mystery genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Assault is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 91 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1971, Assault emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Drama, Horror, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of After a schoolgirl is raped while taking a short cut through the local woods, and another murdered a few days later, the police are baffled. Unlike standard genre fare, Assault attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Assault features a noteworthy lineup led by Suzy Kendall . Supported by the likes of Frank Finlay and Freddie Jones , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Assault (1971) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Assault is a Crime, Drama, Horror, Mystery film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Assault attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Assault reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Assault incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, drama, horror, mystery film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Assault adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.1/10, and global collection metrics, Assault stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1971 cinematic year.
Assault has received mixed reviews with a 5.1/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Assault is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Drama, Horror movies, but read reviews first.
Assault may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_A rapist/murderer lurks in the woods outside a girls’ school near London_** “Assault” (1971) was renamed “In the Devil’s Garden” for its American release. It fits because the only eyewitness in the movie says that the killer looks like the devil. Yet producers also wanted to take advantage of satan’s popularity in cinema in 1973-1974 when it finally made it to America. Lesley-Anne Down appears as the main student and was only 16 years-old during shooting. She hadn’t yet blossomed into the jaw-dropping beauty of “The Great Train Robbery” eight years later, but it’s interesting seeing her when she was so young. Elsewhere, Suzy Kendall plays the art teacher, the story’s heroine, and is quite attractive with the quintessential early 70’s look. As for the masculine cast, there’s a pesky reporter reminiscent of the soon-to-come Kolchak. Meanwhile three main suspects rise to the fore, but I had a hard time distinguishing between them. At the end of the day, this is a British murder mystery comparable to a giallo and I found the commentary on male lust psychologically interesting. For instance, the headmistress’ husband regularly leers at the girls at the school and even “cops a feel” when he can, which naturally doesn’t help his marriage. It’s frustrating for the wife, needless to say. Then there’s the contrast between fantasizing about alluring lasses versus actually raping & killing them. As the detective points out, he can’t book men for their dubious thoughts, only their criminal actions. You have to roll with the questionable elements in order to appreciate the flick. For instance, why would the killer be skulking in the titular “garden” waiting for prey when he knew the area was taboo by that point, although a clueless girl indeed walks through. Not to mention, the teacher & several of her students drive through at the very moment a crime is committed (or, more accurately, just committed). Why Sure! It runs 1 hours, 31 minutes, and was shot in Buckinghamshire, which is just northwest of London, and more specifically: Heatherden Hall, Pinewood Studios; Windsor’s End; Black Park Country Park; and London Road, Beaconsfield. GRADE: B-
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.