Is Between Midnight and Dawn Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Between Midnight and Dawn is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Between Midnight and Dawn is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Between Midnight and Dawn is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1950, Between Midnight and Dawn emerges as a significant entry in the Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Rocky and Dan, war buddies, are prowl car cops on night duty. Unlike standard genre fare, Between Midnight and Dawn attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Between Midnight and Dawn features a noteworthy lineup led by Mark Stevens . Supported by the likes of Edmond O'Brien and Gale Storm , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Between Midnight and Dawn (1950) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Between Midnight and Dawn is a Crime film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Between Midnight and Dawn attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Between Midnight and Dawn reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Between Midnight and Dawn incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Between Midnight and Dawn adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, Between Midnight and Dawn stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1950 cinematic year.
Between Midnight and Dawn has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Between Midnight and Dawn is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Between Midnight and Dawn may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Here, buy yourself a new head. One with a brain in it! Between Midnight and Dawn is directed by Gordon Douglas and adapted to screenplay by Eugene Ling from a story by Gerald Drayson Adams and Leo Katcher. It stars Edmond O'Brien, Mark Stevens, Gale Storm, Donald Buka and Gale Robbins. Music is by George Duning and cinematography by George E. Diskant. Stevens and O'Brien play two prowl car cops, long time friends who fall for the same woman (Storm), but that could never come between them. That's the job of rising crime boss Ritchie Garris (Buka)... On the page it looked as if it easily could have got bogged down by romantic threads and buddy buddy cop formula. Thankfully that isn't the case. Finding its way into a number of film noir publications, it's a pic that only just qualifies on account of certain narrative thematics and the night time photography of the always excellent Diskant. On its own terms anyway it's a damn good policer, one that is handled with knowing direction from Douglas and features the reassuring presences of Stevens and O'Brien, both of whom play cops with different attitudes to the job, but both believable and never played as trite good cop bad cop fodder. In the lady corner are Storm and Robbins, the former in the middle of our twin testosterone fuelled coppers, and the latter the gangster's moll. Both sultry and beautiful - even if Storm is sporting a hairstyle that equally is both distracting for the character and does her obvious sexiness no favours, but both the gals are written with thought and performed as such. Then there is Buka as scumbag Garris. This character clearly has ideas above his station, something which our coppers gleefully like to remind him of. But Garris is a nasty piece of work, which ultimately leads us to a thrilling and suspenseful finale. Buka (The Street with No Name) really should have had a bigger noir/crime film career. Sometimes funny and laced with choice dialogue, this still also manages to impact with dramatic, suspenseful and attention grabbing scenes. This a film that's easy to recommend to lovers of 40s/50s policer movies; it's also pretty bloody for the time. There's a great crew behind this and they don't let anyone down. 7/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.