Is Blood Feast Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Blood Feast is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 67 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Blood Feast is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Blood Feast is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 67 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1963, Blood Feast emerges as a significant entry in the Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In the sleepy suburbs of Miami, seemingly normal Egyptian immigrant Fuad Ramses runs a successful catering business. Unlike standard genre fare, Blood Feast attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood Feast features a noteworthy lineup led by William Kerwin . Supported by the likes of Mal Arnold and Connie Mason , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Blood Feast (1963) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Blood Feast is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Blood Feast attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Blood Feast reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $24.5K |
| Worldwide Gross | $4.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Blood Feast is $24.5K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.




CultpixAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.8/10, and global collection metrics, Blood Feast stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1963 cinematic year.
Blood Feast is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.8/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.8/10, Blood Feast may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Blood Feast is currently available for streaming on Cultpix. You can also check for it on platforms like Cultpix depending on your region.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise