Is Blood Hook Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Blood Hook is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Blood Hook is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Comedy, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Blood Hook is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1987, Blood Hook emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Comedy, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of During a local fishing contest, people are being mysteriously dragged into the lake and killed by a giant fish hook. Unlike standard genre fare, Blood Hook attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood Hook features a noteworthy lineup led by Mark Jacobs . Supported by the likes of Lisa Jane Todd and Patrick Danz , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Blood Hook (1987) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Blood Hook is a Horror, Comedy, Thriller film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Blood Hook attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Blood Hook reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $200.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Blood Hook is $200.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.


Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
Philo
Screambox Amazon Channel
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Troma NOW
Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel
Amazon Video
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.6/10, and global collection metrics, Blood Hook stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1987 cinematic year.
Blood Hook is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.6/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.6/10, Blood Hook may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Blood Hook is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, fuboTV, Philo, Screambox Amazon Channel, Amazon Prime Video with Ads, Troma NOW, Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel depending on your region.
**_What if a killer hunts people like he’s gone fishin’?_** A 21 year-old youth (Mark Jacobs) inherits his family’s cabin in remote northwestern Wisconsin and promptly brings four friends to check it out and have some vacation fun at the lake during an annual fishing contest. Unfortunately, the cicadas are out and someone has a mad habit of literally fishing for people! "Blood Hook" (1987) was shot in ’86 and only cost $200,000 by a director that went on to work for Mystery Science Theater 3000. As such, this is low-budget slasher with camp and a wink of humor. It comes across as a mixture of Tobe Hooper’s “Eaten Alive” (1976) and the forthcoming "State Park" (1988), aka "Heavy Metal Summer." While it’s better than Hooper’s flick in some ways, it’s not quite as entertaining as the latter. It’s like a tale from Steve Gerber’s Man-Thing comics of the 70s, just without a swamp monster Sara Hauser (Kiersten) stands out on the feminine front, although Sandy Meuwissen (Bev) is worth a mention. Meanwhile Lisa Jane Todd (Ann) is an interesting character. To appreciate this movie you have to be willing to give it a chance. If you do, there are quite a few rewarding bits despite its comic book tone and lack of funds, especially in the second half. For instance, some of the humor is genuinely amusing in a low-key way; plus you get to know the characters, like the half-crazed Vietnam vet (Bill Lowrie as Evelyn), the psychology major (Ann) and the main protagonist (who looks like Nicolas Cage in the mid-80s). What sets off the killer is actually quite creative, tying into diabolus in musica, aka "the devil in music,” which refers to the so-called devil’s chord or devil’s tritone. Meanwhile the gore effects are good all things considered. The film runs 1 hour, 51 minutes, but there’s a 92-minute version by Troma on disc (Blu-ray). It is true that the original version is too long by about 20 minutes, but I prefer it to the short rendition due to the character development. It was shot at Hayward & Hayward Lake, Wisconsin, which is located in the northwestern part of the state, about 40 miles south of western Lake Superior and 30 miles east of the border of Minnesota. GRADE: B-/C+
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.