Performance & Direction: Blood Money Review
Last updated: January 29, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blood Money (1933) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Crime.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood Money features a noteworthy lineup led by George Bancroft . Supported by the likes of Judith Anderson and Frances Dee , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Blood Money
Quick Plot Summary: Blood Money is a Crime film that dives into the criminal underworld with a grounded sense of realism and complex morality. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blood Money
Ending Breakdown: Blood Money resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to crime resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the crime themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blood Money reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Blood Money Real vs. Reel: Is it Based on a True Story?
Blood Money incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
Historical Context
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Blood Money adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Who Should Watch Blood Money?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Crime films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: Blood Money
All Cast & Crew →











Blood Money Parents Guide & Age Rating
1933 AdvisoryWondering about Blood Money age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blood Money is 65 minutes (1h 5m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.0/10, and global performance metrics, Blood Money is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1933 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blood Money worth watching?
Blood Money is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies. It has a verified rating of 7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blood Money parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blood Money identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blood Money?
The total duration of Blood Money is 65 minutes, which is approximately 1h 5m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blood Money
How Blood Money Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blood Money
This is a saucy pre-code melodrama that deserves cult status. Bail bondsman George Bancroft is known all throughout New York City and encounters people from every scrape of society in this pre-code crime drama. But he's going to need every ounce of street-smarts when he strikes up an acquaintance with kleptomaniac Frances Dee, a woman with a rather animistic sexual appetite. Judith Anderson gets to display a rare glamorous side here as the nightclub hostess obviously in love with Bancroft, with her famous mole darkened into a beauty spot. Dee gives Bancroft several looks that It's nice to see her playing a softer character. This is a fast-moving programmer, made on a dime, but not showing it. Quick edits, snappy photography and dialog, nice musical interludes by Blossom Seeley (singing such standards as "Melancholy Baby"), and a side of seedy New York sung about in the same year's "42nd Street" diluted in most movies. There's hints about lesbianism in addition to Dee's whacked-out libido. Tons of familiar character actors pop in and out, most notably Etienne Girardot, Chick Chandler (as Anderson's gangster brother), Clarence Wilson and Edward Van Sloan. There's even a very young Lucille Ball in a quick appearance! An exciting dog racing sequence is one of the film's visual highlights, and the finale is downright suspenseful, like something Hitchcock might do.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










