Performance & Direction: Blood of Dracula Review
Last updated: February 2, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blood of Dracula (1957) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood of Dracula features a noteworthy lineup led by Sandra Harrison . Supported by the likes of Louise Lewis and Gail Ganley , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Blood of Dracula
Quick Plot Summary: Blood of Dracula is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blood of Dracula
Ending Breakdown: Blood of Dracula attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blood of Dracula reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blood of Dracula?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: Blood of Dracula
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $82.0K |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Blood of Dracula Budget
The estimated production budget for Blood of Dracula is $82.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Blood of Dracula
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Blood of Dracula Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Shout! Factory Amazon Channel🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoBlood of Dracula Parents Guide & Age Rating
1957 AdvisoryWondering about Blood of Dracula age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blood of Dracula is 69 minutes (1h 9m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.8/10, and global performance metrics, Blood of Dracula is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1957 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blood of Dracula worth watching?
Blood of Dracula is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 4.8/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blood of Dracula parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blood of Dracula identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blood of Dracula?
The total duration of Blood of Dracula is 69 minutes, which is approximately 1h 9m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blood of Dracula
How Blood of Dracula Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blood of Dracula
Staggeringly Lame - A Brain Drain - Contrived Cack. A teenage girl, bit of a rebel, is sent away to a girls school. Her fiery nature brings her to the attention of the science teacher, who, using a Carpathian amulet, uses the girl for nefarious deeds. OK! You understand why plenty of folk love the cruddy schlockers of the 50s (I love me plenty as well), the films that were the bottom half of a bottom of the barrel drive-in double bill. Quite often there's a charm to be found, even some that genuinely have craft, guile and surprise enough to warrant love and affection. Blood of Dracula (AKA: Blood Is My Heritage) is devoid of charm and doesn't work hard to earn support. As has been pointed out by the horror faithful over the years, there is no blood and no Dracula in this film - though Dracula as plural does get a mention during one of the many many long and dull passages of chatter within. The narrative plods along until angry girl meets angry science teacher and it's hypnotism time! Yay. Enter a creature that looks like Eddie Munster with bad teeth. All violent damage is done off screen, an interim pop tune and dance sequence is just bizarre, and the plot's motives really don't make any sense. Herman Cohen (producer) was not dumb. I Was a Teenage Werewolf and I Was a Teenage Frankenstein, the two other films in this schlocky trilogy, are good fun. He was capable of overseeing some good movies pitched at a teen audience - even having something to say about the youth/adult divide. Sadly his vampire excursion is not only lazy, it's also very dull. 2/10
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
