Performance & Direction: Blood on the Arrow Review
Last updated: February 2, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blood on the Arrow (1964) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 3.7/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Western.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Western is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood on the Arrow features a noteworthy lineup led by Dale Robertson . Supported by the likes of Martha Hyer and Wendell Corey , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Blood on the Arrow
Quick Plot Summary: Blood on the Arrow is a Western film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blood on the Arrow
Ending Breakdown: Blood on the Arrow attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to western resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the western themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blood on the Arrow reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blood on the Arrow?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Western films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Blood on the Arrow
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Blood on the Arrow Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
AMC Plus Apple TV Channel 
AMC+ Amazon Channel
AMC+
YouTube TV
Philo
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Shout! Factory Amazon Channel🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoBlood on the Arrow Parents Guide & Age Rating
1964 AdvisoryWondering about Blood on the Arrow age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blood on the Arrow is 92 minutes (1h 32m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 3.7/10, and global performance metrics, Blood on the Arrow is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1964 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blood on the Arrow worth watching?
Blood on the Arrow is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies. It has a verified rating of 3.7/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blood on the Arrow parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blood on the Arrow identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blood on the Arrow?
The total duration of Blood on the Arrow is 92 minutes, which is approximately 1h 32m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blood on the Arrow
How Blood on the Arrow Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blood on the Arrow
Grade B wannabe “Shane” in the Arizona desert “Blood on the Arrow” (1964) is a “B” Western, which mixes together several staples of the genre: Calvary, outlaws, saguaro cacti, Indians, gunfights, a trading post, a hottie, a mine and gold. It rips-off blatant elements of “Shane” and transplants them to the Arizona desert, but gets away with it because there are enough differences. It’s just severely mediocre by comparison, although Dale Robertson is stalwart as the hopefully redeemable outlaw protagonist and Martha Hyer is a blonde beauty worth risking everything. Regrettably, there are some “Why sure!” plot problems and what’s up with the trap door that’s anything but hidden? Also, you’ll clearly see power/telephone lines on 3-4 occasions. I’m assuming that the producers felt they’d pass for telegraph lines, which WERE present in 1871 when the story takes place. I’ll accept that argument, I guess. GRADE: C/C-
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
