Performance & Direction: Blood Stalkers Review
Last updated: January 28, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blood Stalkers (1976) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood Stalkers features a noteworthy lineup led by Ken Miller . Supported by the likes of Toni Crabtree and Jerry Albert , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Blood Stalkers
Quick Plot Summary: Blood Stalkers is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blood Stalkers
Ending Breakdown: Blood Stalkers attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blood Stalkers reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blood Stalkers?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Blood Stalkers
All Cast & Crew →

Where to Watch Blood Stalkers Online?
Streaming HubBlood Stalkers Parents Guide & Age Rating
1976 AdvisoryWondering about Blood Stalkers age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blood Stalkers is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.0/10, and global performance metrics, Blood Stalkers is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1976 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blood Stalkers worth watching?
Blood Stalkers is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 4/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blood Stalkers parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blood Stalkers identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blood Stalkers?
The total duration of Blood Stalkers is 90 minutes, which is approximately 1h 30m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blood Stalkers
How Blood Stalkers Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blood Stalkers
**_Micro-budget cabin-in-the-woods flick in the swamps of Florida_** Two married couples go out to an inherited hunting lodge, which has been vacant for eight years. They experience curious resistance from the yokels when they ask about the place. Worse, they’re in for a night to dismember. "Blood Stalkers" (1976), aka “The Night Daniel Died,” was obviously inspired by “Deliverance,” but also includes some (possible) swamp ape frolics. It starts out surprisingly well for a spare change Indie, as you get to know the four protagonists, although it starts to drag a bit. Voluptuous Cisse Cameron as Jeri is a highlight and so is blonde Toni Crabtree as Kim, the latter appearing in a tame nighttime skinny dipping sequence (just a heads up). After the midpoint, unfortunately, there’s an extended nighttime sequence that’s too dark and tedious, which reflects lousy filmmaking. However, the bad parts are usually counterbalanced by effective sequences such as the artistic black church segment. The violent close is well done, all things considered, and I liked the explanation. Ken Miller, who plays the secondary protagonist (Daniel), was 43 during shooting in June, 1975, while Cisse Cameron, who plays his wife, was 21. I bring this up because someone complained about how much older he was than her. But Cisse could easily pass for mid-30s, so it’s not really an issue. And, besides, it’s not like husbands being significantly older than their wives is rare. Some of the music was composed by Stan Webb, who went on to contribute a song to “Thelma & Louise.” The rest was done by Blood Sweat and Tears, who were uncredited to save money. This was the sole flick directed by the writer/director, who happens to play the bald yokel in the film. He supposedly saw Bigfoot when he was 21 and appeared in four sasquatch documentaries between 1972-76, not to mention lectured at colleges and universities before retiring to western Montana. "Blackwater" (2007) is a better movie of this no-budget Indie sort, which involves four women as the protagonists rather than two couples. It runs 1 hour, 34 minutes, and was shot in southeastern Florida at Fort Lauderdale and the Everglades just west of there. GRADE: C/C- (4.5/10)
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.








