Blood Tracks
Performance & Direction: Blood Tracks Review
Last updated: January 24, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blood Tracks (1985) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 3.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blood Tracks features a noteworthy lineup led by Jeff Harding . Supported by the likes of Michael Fitzpatrick and Naomi Kaneda , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Blood Tracks (1985) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.8/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: Blood Tracks
Quick Plot Summary: Blood Tracks is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blood Tracks
Ending Breakdown: Blood Tracks attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blood Tracks reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blood Tracks?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Blood Tracks
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Blood Tracks Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Eternal Family🎟️ Rent on
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Fandango At HomeBlood Tracks Parents Guide & Age Rating
1985 AdvisoryWondering about Blood Tracks age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blood Tracks is 89 minutes (1h 29m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 3.8/10, and global performance metrics, Blood Tracks is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1985 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blood Tracks worth watching?
Blood Tracks is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 3.8/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blood Tracks parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blood Tracks identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blood Tracks?
The total duration of Blood Tracks is 89 minutes, which is approximately 1h 29m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blood Tracks
How Blood Tracks Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blood Tracks
Pretty lackluster indie horror film with shoddy acting though some of the gore effects were okay I guess. Heavy influence from The Hills Have Eyes as well, just set in a snowy environment instead of the desert. Watchable but just a bad B-movie, but I wonder if it'd be entertaining in a group setting. **1.75/5**
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
