Performance & Direction: Blue Blood Review
Last updated: January 23, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blue Blood (1974) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blue Blood features a noteworthy lineup led by Oliver Reed . Supported by the likes of Fiona Lewis and Anna Gaël , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Blue Blood (1974) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.0/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: Blue Blood
Quick Plot Summary: Blue Blood is a Drama, Horror film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Blue Blood
Ending Breakdown: Blue Blood attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blue Blood reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blue Blood?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Blue Blood
All Cast & Crew →






Where to Watch Blue Blood Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Cultpix🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoBlue Blood Parents Guide & Age Rating
1974 AdvisoryWondering about Blue Blood age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blue Blood is 86 minutes (1h 26m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.0/10, and global performance metrics, Blue Blood is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1974 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blue Blood worth watching?
Blue Blood is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 4/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blue Blood parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blue Blood identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blue Blood?
The total duration of Blue Blood is 86 minutes, which is approximately 1h 26m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blue Blood
How Blue Blood Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blue Blood
My, but this is a howler.... Oliver Reed is the singularly nasty "Tom", butler to the suitably wimpish "Lord Gregory" (Derek Jacobi). In addition, I hope to stop us all dying from boredom, "Tom" is also the grand wizard (?) of a Satanic cult that practices it's devilish antics in the stately pile of his unwitting host (aptly filmed at Longleat House - home of the late Marquess of Bath - he of the "wifelets"). Anyway, what ensues is a sort of dirty "Downton Abbey". Just about everyone sleeps with the other; the cluttered plot is preposterous and both Reed (I hope) and Jacobi (I trust) had their tongues firmly in their cheeks as this nonsense trundles on for what seemed like an interminable 90 minutes. Some lovely Paisley pattern clothing - if that's your thing, but I'm afraid this is amongst the worst British films that I have ever sat through.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.








