Is Body Count Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Body Count is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Body Count is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Mystery genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Body Count is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1986, Body Count emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A bodybuilder, a junk-food addict and a wild blonde nymph and their friends are stalked by a terrifying figure. Unlike standard genre fare, Body Count attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Body Count features a noteworthy lineup led by Bruce Penhall . Supported by the likes of Mimsy Farmer and David Hess , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Body Count (1986) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Body Count is a Horror, Mystery film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Body Count attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Body Count reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:










Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5/10, and global collection metrics, Body Count stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1986 cinematic year.
Body Count has received mixed reviews with a 5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Body Count is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Mystery movies, but read reviews first.
Body Count is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
**_A surreal outing in the Colorado mountains, not to mention horrific and… insightful_** A group of youths in Colorado take a camping trip at a defunct camp, but the owners allow them to stay since they’re friends of their son, who’s just returning from the Marines. Unfortunately, there are legends of an old American Indian Shaman, who has a penchant for cursing people. David Hess plays the curmudgeonly owner of the camp while Charles Napier is on hand as the Sheriff. "Body Count" (1986) is an Italian slasher in the tradition of the Friday the 13th flicks & their knockoffs that were popular at the time. Its original title is “Camping del Terrore,” which translates as “Camp of Terror” or “Terror Camp.” I wouldn’t exactly call this a rip-off since the story is totally different, not to mention Mario Bava's "A Bay of Blood" (1971) inspired the Friday the 13th flicks in the first place, at least the party-minded youths visiting the desolate former-resort. What’s interesting is that this is an Italian’s INTERPRETATION OF youths taking a camping trip in Colorado since it was shot entirely in Italy with a mostly Italian cast & crew. I’m speaking as someone who has camped out in Colorado many times, including staying in a cabin. As such, the characters social interactions and the general happenings come across more surreal than real. Take, for example, the accent of the Southern girl: Sure, it sounds Southern, but it’s also noticeably off. So, you have to get used to the weird tone and the typical bad editing that Italian filmmakers were known for. It didn’t help that the production was plagued by problems, including bad weather during the 4-week shoot in the mountains, not to mention two additional writers had to be enlisted to work out the kinks in Alessandro Capone’s original screenplay. If you can embrace it, however, the movie delivers the goods as a unique slasher with a story that is anything but one-dimensional and offers insights on human nature. For instance, evil isn’t limited to the proverbial boogeyman, which is often merely a scapegoat, it could just as well originate in everyday fathers, mothers or children. The voluptuous Nancy Brilli stands out on the female front as Tracy (the one in red leotards). Most of the other women are interesting one way or another. The film runs about 1 hour, 30 minutes (or several minutes shorter, in my case), and was shot at Campo Imperatore, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy, which is a 95-minute drive east of Rome in the central Apennine Mountains. GRADE: B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.