Is Borg vs McEnroe Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Borg vs McEnroe is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Borg vs McEnroe is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Borg vs McEnroe is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2017, Borg vs McEnroe emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The Swedish Björn Borg and the American John McEnroe, the best tennis players in the world, maintain a legendary duel during the 1980 Wimbledon tournament. Unlike standard genre fare, Borg vs McEnroe attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Borg vs McEnroe features a noteworthy lineup led by Sverrir Gudnason . Supported by the likes of Shia LaBeouf and Stellan Skarsgård , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Borg vs McEnroe (2017) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Borg vs McEnroe is a Drama, History film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
This character-driven narrative explores the internal and external conflicts that define the human experience. The Swedish Björn Borg and the American John McEnroe, the best tennis players in the world, maintain a legendary duel during the 1980 Wimbledon tournament. The screenplay takes time to develop its characters, allowing audiences to connect emotionally with their struggles and triumphs. Each scene builds upon the last, creating a cumulative emotional impact.
Ending Breakdown: Borg vs McEnroe concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Borg vs McEnroe reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Borg vs McEnroe draws heavily from documented historical records. As a drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Borg vs McEnroe adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $7.5M |
| Worldwide Gross | $16.7M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Borg vs McEnroe is $7.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Netflix
Netflix Standard with Ads
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.9/10, and global collection metrics, Borg vs McEnroe stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2017 cinematic year.
Borg vs McEnroe has received mixed reviews with a 6.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Borg vs McEnroe is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, History movies, but read reviews first.
Borg vs McEnroe is currently available for streaming on Netflix. You can also check for it on platforms like Netflix, Netflix Standard with Ads depending on your region.
You can't be serious! Borg vs McEnroe is directed by Janus Metz and written by Ronnie Sandahl. It stars Sverrir Gudnason, Shia LaBeouf, Stellan Skarsgård and Tuva Novotny. The Swedish Björn Borg (Gudnason) and the American John McEnroe (LaBeouf), the best tennis players in the world, maintain a legendary duel during the 1980 Wimbledon tournament. Cut to the chase, this is one for tennis fans to gorge upon, but even then it's a bit too lop sided to fully delight. Being a Swedish production it's heavily loaded towards the personal worries that were plaguing Borg in the very early 1980s. Sadly this renders McEnroe - one of the games greatest and most colourful characters - as being a support player in what set out to be a biographical pic about sports rivalry. However, what does come across is that both men were driven and actually both were tits for varying reasons. There's unsurprisingly some parental pressures, while Borg feels the strain of breaking records (as his wife chain smokes) and McEnroe strives to get on the ladder to greatness. Sure the tennis sequences don't hold up to scrutiny but both Gudnason and LaBeouf (excellent and excellently cast) come out of the physicalities very well. Ultimately it's a character study that doesn't delve too deeply for equal parties, but come the 1980 Wimbledon final, with one of the greatest 4th sets ever played, you should be hard pressed not to rejoice. Not only in the sport of tennis played to the max, but in how two supposed rivals actually became the best of friends. 7/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.