Is Broadway Damage Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Broadway Damage is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 111 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Broadway Damage is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Drama, Romance genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Broadway Damage is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 111 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1997, Broadway Damage emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Drama, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A quirky, romantic comedy about the complexity and frustration of finding a true love in the gay community. Unlike standard genre fare, Broadway Damage attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Broadway Damage features a noteworthy lineup led by Hugh Panaro . Supported by the likes of Michael Shawn Lucas and Mara Hobel , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Broadway Damage (1997) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Broadway Damage is a Comedy, Drama, Romance film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Broadway Damage attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Broadway Damage reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:





Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, Broadway Damage stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1997 cinematic year.
Broadway Damage has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Broadway Damage is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Drama, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Broadway Damage may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
"Marc" (Michael Lucas) and his best pal "Robert" (Aaron Williams) need to find somewhere to live, so check out the deaths column in the papers and find an unoccupied apartment. "Marc" moves in with his friend "Cynthia" (Mara Hobel) and what quickly follows is a rather weak comedy will they/won't it romance. "Marc" espies a musical neighbour "David" (Hugh Panaro) and after a coffee in the stairwell he falls hook, line and sinker. His new amour already has, however, a boyfriend "Chuck" (Jonathan Walker) and, of course we know from the start that "Robert" has an huge crush on his friend but has no idea how/if to take it forward. The love triangle, ménage-à-trois thing has some amusing legs at the beginning but they quickly run out of steam and the film resorts increasingly to annoyingly over-scripted stereotypes about love, lust, frustration, musical theatre references and commitment phobia amongst young gay men. The presence of the "Cynthia" character seems specifically designed to irritate - she brings nothing at all the dynamic aside from get in the way of what plot there might have originally been while the film was on the drawing board. It's like two or three episodes of "Will and Grace" clumsily bolted together only without the wit or characterisations. I wouldn't bother, sorry.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.