Is Bufferin Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Bufferin is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 33 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Bufferin is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Bufferin is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 33 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1966, Bufferin emerges as a significant entry in the Cinema domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Gerard Malanga reads some of his poems and excerpts from his diaries substituting the word “bufferin” for most of the proper names in the readings, while Ronna Page gives an ongoing commentary in the film. Unlike standard genre fare, Bufferin attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Film is often anchored by its ensemble, and Bufferin features a noteworthy lineup led by Gerard Malanga .
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Bufferin (1966) is negative. With an audience rating of NR, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Bufferin stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1966 cinematic year.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.