Is Burn Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Burn is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Burn is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Thriller, Crime, Action genre.
Answer: Yes, Burn is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2019, Burn emerges as a significant entry in the Thriller, Crime, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Lonely, unstable gas station attendant Melinda is tired of being overshadowed by her more confident, outgoing co-worker Sheila. Unlike standard genre fare, Burn attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Thriller is often anchored by its ensemble, and Burn features a noteworthy lineup led by Tilda Cobham-Hervey . Supported by the likes of Josh Hutcherson and Suki Waterhouse , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Burn (2019) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Burn is a Thriller, Crime, Action film that builds tension through unpredictable twists and keeps audiences guessing until the final reveal. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Burn concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to thriller resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Burn reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Burn incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a thriller, crime, action film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Burn adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $25.4K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |










Starz Apple TV Channel
Starz Roku Premium Channel
Starz
Philo
Starz Amazon Channel
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, Burn stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2019 cinematic year.
Burn has received mixed reviews with a 6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Burn is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Thriller, Crime, Action movies, but read reviews first.
Burn is currently available for streaming on Starz Apple TV Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Starz Apple TV Channel, Starz Roku Premium Channel, Starz, Philo, Starz Amazon Channel depending on your region.
Does that "Starts in the middle of the action the flashes back to the start" thing that crops up sometimes, which I don't really like in movies. I think it works well for the ocassional episode of television and **sometimes** works out in mystery films, but even then, usually not. In a regular movie it mostly just feels like either they didn't have faith that their movie could keep audiences interested until the action kicks off later on, or they just can't figure out a decent way to start their movie off. Maybe both. Anyway, trying to pass off Josh Hutcherson as a brutish bad boy is fuckin' laughable and this whole thing is woefully under-explored. Can't think of anything quite like it I've seen before though, so points for that. _Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
So, the slightly amateurish "Billy" (Josh Hutcherson) decides to rob a gas station staffed by two girls - "Melinda" (Tilda Cobham-Harvey) and "Sheila" (Suki Waterhouse). The former girl is a bit strange, subdued, reticent even; her colleague far more confident with men but when the heist happens "Melinda" decides that this might be a time to assert herself with the young man. What now ensues borders on slapstick at times as she manages to take him hostage, sellotapes him to a chair (whereupon she tries to have sex with him...!) before, well - you really have to watch it. It has some quite surreal moments. Handsome Harry Shum Jr. turns up now and again as an wholly ineffective local cop and the whole thing, though pretty basic on both production and writing levels, is actually quite a quirky and watchable effort from Mike Gan that could maybe have lost ten/fifteen minutes of character and scenario establishment, but is still worth a watch.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.