Is Buster Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Buster is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Buster is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Romance, Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Buster is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1988, Buster emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Romance, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Buster is a small time crook who pulls a big time job. Unlike standard genre fare, Buster attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Buster features a noteworthy lineup led by Phil Collins . Supported by the likes of Julie Walters and Larry Lamb , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Buster (1988) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Buster is a Comedy, Romance, Crime film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Buster attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Buster reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Buster incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a comedy, romance, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Buster adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, Buster stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1988 cinematic year.
Buster has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Buster is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Romance, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Buster may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Well at least Phil Collins got a few hits from this, but otherwise it's a really lacklustre and meandering telling of a story that rocked Britain in 1963. He (the eponymous Edwards) and his pals come up with a dastardly scheme to stop Her Majesty's Royal Mail train just after a bank holiday and relieve it of some £2.5 millions in cash. He's not really a nasty man, just a petty larcenist who tries to support his collusive wife (Julie Walters) and his daughter. With another child on the way, though, he needs to up his game and so devises this plan which goes off remarkably smoothly. As ever with heist films though, it's never the robbery that causes the problems - it's the aftermath. That's where the wheels start to come off as the gang are slowly apprehended - all but "Buster" who has managed to stay one step ahead of his pursuers. How long can they stay living in the shadows for? He is coping well enough, but she clamours for an ordinary existence for her and her daughter and reconciling this with their likely future puts enormous strain on the marriage. Something will have to give! Perhaps had this been made in monochrome and used a better ensemble cast, it might have managed to capture more of the audaciousness of their crime. As it is, though, it combines a motley collection of B-list television actors and gives them some overly verbose dialogue to deliver as this starts off quite intriguingly but ends up soapy, stodgy and dull. Even the usually lively Walters can't really inject much into this plodding affair that's left all to often to Colins - and he's just not much good.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


