Is Calling Philo Vance Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Calling Philo Vance is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 62 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Calling Philo Vance is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Mystery genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Calling Philo Vance is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 62 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1940, Calling Philo Vance emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Philo is in Vienna working for the US Government to see if Archer Coe is selling aircraft designs to foreign powers. Unlike standard genre fare, Calling Philo Vance attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Calling Philo Vance features a noteworthy lineup led by James Stephenson . Supported by the likes of Margot Stevenson and Henry O'Neill , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Calling Philo Vance (1940) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Calling Philo Vance is a Crime, Mystery film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Calling Philo Vance attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Calling Philo Vance reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Calling Philo Vance incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, mystery film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Calling Philo Vance adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










TCMAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, Calling Philo Vance stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1940 cinematic year.
Calling Philo Vance has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Calling Philo Vance is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Mystery movies, but read reviews first.
Calling Philo Vance is currently available for streaming on TCM. You can also check for it on platforms like TCM depending on your region.
This is an adequate afternoon B-feature that probably served more as a warning against fifth-columnists than it actually entertained anyone. It all centres around attempts by the Axis powers to obtain access to the designs of "Archer Coe" (the briefest of appearances from Richard Kipling). Now he has an exclusive arrangement with the Americans so when he is found murdered, it falls to the wily, suspicions and tenacious "Vance" (James Stephenson) to find out who the killers were and on whose malevolent behalf they were working? Did they manage to steal his secret plans? Now this is just a substantial reworking of "The Kennel Murder Case" (1933) - even down to whopping great chunks of the script being transferred, albeit updated, to allow for it's WWII scenario. Although all pretty lightweight and devoid of any real sense of jeopardy, Stephenson is actually quite engaging and there is a decent supporting effort from Edward Trophy ("Ryan") delivering some fun to this rather dry, procedural, crime drama. It's only an hour, and if you like the genre then there isn't really anything not to like - or memorable - about this.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise