Is Candy Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Candy is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 124 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Candy is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Candy is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 124 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1968, Candy emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A high school girl encounters a variety of kookie characters and humorous sexual situations while searching for the meaning of life. Unlike standard genre fare, Candy attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Candy features a noteworthy lineup led by Ewa Aulin . Supported by the likes of Charles Aznavour and Marlon Brando , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Candy (1968) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Candy is a Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Candy attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Candy reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $3.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Candy is $3.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Shout! Factory Amazon Channel
Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.1/10, and global collection metrics, Candy stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1968 cinematic year.
Candy has received mixed reviews with a 5.1/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Candy is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy movies, but read reviews first.
Candy is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads, Shout! Factory Amazon Channel depending on your region.
***Zany, sometimes amusing, but dreadfully dull late 60’s curiosity with Burton, Starr, Coburn and Brando*** Released during Christmas in 1968, “Candy” is a satirical interpretation of a classic of literature and thus producers could argue that it had redeeming social value and avoid being judged pornographic, as it was touted in order to draw men to the theater. But it bombed and deservedly so. The titular character of the story (Ewa Aulin) is basically a feminine, swinging 60s version of Voltaire's Candide, who encountered all sorts of abhorrent and deceitful characters in the course of his wanderings but somehow managed to preserve his innocence. Writers Terry Southern (book) and Buck Henry (screenplay) morphed the character to a nubile girl and augmenting the episodes to be sexual in nature, which is what caused the uproar at the time. The "encounters" she experiences involve various stars of the period. Basically, Candy is an innocent & winsome adolescent continually seduced by several institutional isms: romanticism (Richard Burton), patriotism (Walter Matthau), professionalism (James Coburn) and mysticism (Marlon Brando); I’m not sure what ism Ringo Starr’s character falls under (ethnic-ism?). There is also intimidating manipulation, pity and the promise of fame. The institutions and corresponding positions on which every society is based are dubious and misused for men to seduce women. At the end of the day this is a picaresque farce that rides the wave of the excesses, errors and magic of the mid-late 60s. It’s a campy, kitschy, what-were-they-thinking late 60’s flick that’s wannabe magical, but epically fails in that it’s dreadfully dull despite a few moments of genuine amusement, the stellar cast and the protagonist’s naïve beauty (who looks like a melding of Tuesday Weld and Britt Ekland). Brando’s entertaining guru in the last act might be worth the price of admission though. Marlon was fit and never looked better, before he progressively got fat in the 70s-80s. As for the rumor that the movie was pornographic, there’s some wacky titillation and a little tame nudity, but nothing to decry as diabolically pornographic. It’s pretty harmless really. The movie runs 1 hour, 55 minutes and was shot in New York City and Rome, Lazio, Italy. GRADE: C-
I've never done acid before but I imagine this is the movie that would give me that feeling. This two-hour film made me question my sanity. Even as something from the 1960s this is wild and just all around insane and the fact they got they nabbed the likes of Marlon Brando, Richard Burton and James Coburn, not to mention Ringo Starr playing a Mexican, is incredible. Ewa Aulin is beautiful but a terrible actress. I can't imagine how this came to be. **0.5/5**
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.