Performance & Direction: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis Review
Last updated: February 6, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis (2006) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis features a noteworthy lineup led by John Wayne Bobbitt . Supported by the likes of Lorena Bobbitt and Paul Ebert , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis
Quick Plot Summary: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis
Ending Breakdown: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Documentaries films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis
All Cast & Crew →
Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis Parents Guide & Age Rating
2006 AdvisoryWondering about Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis is 47 minutes (47m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.0/10, and global performance metrics, Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 2006 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis worth watching?
Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis identifies it as PG-13. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis?
The total duration of Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis is 47 minutes, which is approximately 0h 47m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis
How Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Chopped Off: The Man Who Lost His Penis
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
