Is Cleanskin Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Cleanskin is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Cleanskin is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Thriller, Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Cleanskin is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2012, Cleanskin emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Thriller, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of While working undercover as a bodyguard to arms dealer Harry, former-soldier-turned-secret-service-agent Ewan survives a bloody shootout with a member of an Islamic terrorist cell who steals Harry's briefcase full of Semtex explosives and escapes. Unlike standard genre fare, Cleanskin attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Cleanskin features a noteworthy lineup led by Sean Bean . Supported by the likes of Abhin Galeya and Charlotte Rampling , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Cleanskin (2012) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Cleanskin is a Drama, Thriller, Crime film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Cleanskin attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Cleanskin reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Cleanskin incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a drama, thriller, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Cleanskin adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Starz Apple TV Channel
Amazon Video
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, Cleanskin stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2012 cinematic year.
Cleanskin has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Cleanskin is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Thriller, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Cleanskin is currently available for streaming on Starz Apple TV Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Starz Apple TV Channel depending on your region.
It's a format I've seen before in British crime thriller/political intrigue films, a format I'm not particularly fond of, and _Cleanskin_ isn't even a well done example of it. No letdowns in the acting department though, so credit where credit's due. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
A young British student (Abhin Galeya) is gradually indoctrinated into a Muslim cell bent on revenge after the "War on Terror", and is pursued by a government agent - Sean Bean - who is pretty much given a clean slate by his boss Charlotte Rampling. The story is told via parallel timelines in which we discover what has driven both men to their current courses of action; and whilst it does use some fairly sweeping stereotypical generalising for plot development, the characterisations delivered by both - especially Galeya - are quite revealing as a potential explanation for extremes in behaviour caused by fear, ignorance and large scale indifference. Regrettably, the dialogue is mundane; and the direction loses focus all to often as we flit between scenarios whilst trying to build up some sort of interest in two rather unlikeable - if good looking - men obsessed with their own perspectives. Rampling features sparingly, as does James Fox, which is a shame as they could have both have been used to further develop the cause and effect toxicity of the storyline. It is worth a watch, but is not particularly original in either concept nor execution.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


