Is Clerks Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Clerks is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Clerks is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.4/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Comedy genre.
Answer: Yes, Clerks is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1994, Clerks emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Convenience and video store clerks Dante and Randal are sharp-witted, potty-mouthed and bored out of their minds. Unlike standard genre fare, Clerks attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Clerks features a noteworthy lineup led by Brian O'Halloran . Supported by the likes of Jeff Anderson and Marilyn Ghigliotti , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Clerks (1994) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.4/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Clerks is a Comedy film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The comedic structure relies on both situational humor and character-based comedy. Convenience and video store clerks Dante and Randal are sharp-witted, potty-mouthed and bored out of their minds. So in between needling customers, the counter jockeys play hockey on the roof, visit a funeral home and deal with their love lives. The film finds humor in relatable situations while maintaining narrative momentum. The jokes serve the story, with callbacks and running gags that reward attentive viewers.
The film operates on multiple levels, using its genre framework to explore deeper themes about human nature, society, and the choices that define us.
Ending Breakdown: Clerks resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Clerks reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $27.6K |
| Worldwide Gross | $3.2M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Clerks is $27.6K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.4/10, and global collection metrics, Clerks stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1994 cinematic year.
Clerks is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.4/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Comedy movies.
Yes, Clerks is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Comedy cinema.
Clerks may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Over the years, I have really enjoyed Smith's comic book writing, but this is the only film so far I have seen him direct. My cinephilic friends tend to dismiss his recent works, but this was very enjoyable. I like the influence he has had on independent cinema. 1994 certainly proved to be an important year for it, with the smash successes that independent studios had with 'Clerks' and 'Pulp Fiction'. I hope he sticks to directing films that he himself writes. I have the feeling he wants to expand his horizons but isn't quite sure how to go about it without alienating his huge fanbase. I have great confidence in him, and feel that if he puts his heart into it, he can be a great filmmaker, instead of a good one. I think for him to do so, he could do himself a great service and read a few less comic books and watch a lot more movies, particularly by the Hollywood greats from the Golden Age, such as Sir Alfred Hitchcock, Howard Hawks, Raoul Walsh and John Ford. It would be quite exciting to see what he comes up with, once his creative juices are recharged.
**A rude but understandable film.** I just saw this film, and honestly I was hoping for a slightly different comedy, with a more elaborate, more conventional structure and not based so much on endless dialogues. It is, however, an independent film, made a little outside of what traditional circuits and big studios are, and the budget is limited. If we consider all this, I think we can understand the film better. The film basically accompanies a day in the life of two commercial employees who hate their jobs but need them, like any mortal. They work closely together and are friends, but the day promises not to be easy for either of them. The film is based on jokes of a very rude nature, sometimes also on the inelegant manners of the characters. There are a lot of allusions to pop culture throughout the movie as well, and I didn't always get that. It's not the kind of humor I really enjoy, though the film has its moments. Perhaps this style of humor works better with young people and teenagers than with someone more adult... The cast features a number of actors that I don't really know. Brian O'Halloran and Jeff Anderson had their most relevant work in this film, from what I've seen. The film is quite restrained in terms of costumes and scenery, and I believe that real stores were used for the production. What can be considered a weakness, the low budget, was to some extent an advantage, taking into account the type of film they preferred to make here. The cinematography is very good and well used, and is perhaps the film's most artistic feature.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.



Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise