Is Clockstoppers Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Clockstoppers is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 94 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Clockstoppers is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Family, Science Fiction, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Clockstoppers is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 94 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2002, Clockstoppers emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, Family, Science Fiction, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Until now, Zak Gibbs' greatest challenge has been to find a way to buy a car. Unlike standard genre fare, Clockstoppers attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Clockstoppers features a noteworthy lineup led by Jesse Bradford . Supported by the likes of Paula Garcés and French Stewart , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Clockstoppers (2002) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Clockstoppers is a Adventure, Family, Science Fiction, Thriller film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Clockstoppers attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Clockstoppers reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $26.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $38.8M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Clockstoppers is $26.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.3/10, and global collection metrics, Clockstoppers stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2002 cinematic year.
Clockstoppers has received mixed reviews with a 5.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Clockstoppers is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, Family, Science Fiction movies, but read reviews first.
Clockstoppers may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Decent watch, could watch again, and can recommend, probably more for a younger audience. For a movie about technology that would make you into a speedster, you'd think this would be phenomenal. The "hyperspeed" effect itself and it's presentation in the movie is amazing, even with the "mad scientist" trope accompanying it. The cast isn't bad by far, but, for this, they could have been quite better to really sell the effects and create a better atmosphere for the story. The story itself is good, it makes a lot of sense, the character interaction is pretty good, and it actually structures a compelling narrative. It's not like the production value is bad either; this is a good example of being able to tick all the boxes and still falling short without actually failing.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.