Is Code 46 Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Code 46 is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Code 46 is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller genre.
Answer: Yes, Code 46 is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2003, Code 46 emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In a dystopian future, insurance fraud investigator William Gold arrives in Shanghai to investigate a forgery ring for "papelles", futuristic passports that record people's identities and genetics. Unlike standard genre fare, Code 46 attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Code 46 features a noteworthy lineup led by Tim Robbins . Supported by the likes of Samantha Morton and Nabil Elouahabi , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Code 46 (2003) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Code 46 is a Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Code 46 concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Code 46 reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $7.5M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Code 46 is $7.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
MGM+ Amazon Channel
MGM Plus Roku Premium Channel
MGM Plus
Philo
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.2/10, and global collection metrics, Code 46 stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2003 cinematic year.
Code 46 has received mixed reviews with a 6.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Code 46 is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Code 46 is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, fuboTV, MGM+ Amazon Channel, MGM Plus Roku Premium Channel, MGM Plus, Philo, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
I struggle with some of these futuristic dystopian dramas simply because I can never imagine how humanity could ever find itself in the situation where life could really be like this. This one adds an additional, if entirely accidental, Oedipean element to the plot. “Geld” (Tim Robbins) is an investigator who tracks down folks who peddle in fake travel documents. Believe it or not, this is big business in a world where travel is tightly regulated by the governmental “Sphinx”. His latest trip takes him to Shanghai where he encounters “Maria” (Samantha Morton) whom he quickly deduces is behind the forgeries, but he’s too smitten to do anything about it as he embarks on twenty-four hours of activities he might not like to recount to his wife at home. Anyway, back home he goes only for his boss to enquire as to why he seemed to have failed in his mission and to promptly send him back. Was this his plan all along - to be sent back? Well when he tries to find “Maria” again, he discovers that she has undergone memory erasing treatment following her alleged breaching of “Code 46”. He also discovers that she is not quite the random person he had initially supposed, and that the genetics of two into one don’t really go! Essentially this comes across as a curious take on a love story, with Robbins confidently delivering a persona that still yearns for a degree of humanity in the face of an increasingly sterile and prescribed human existence. Morton also delivers well, exuding a certain vulnerability as her character sits on the wrong side of an arbitrarily defined society that discriminates indiscriminately. The plot tries to reconcile some more scientific concepts alongside the emotionally conflicted ones, but that’s where I found it’s wheels came off. It hasn’t quite the convictions to deliver without reaching an uncomfortable compromise that I felt rather let the whole thing down, and boy can it take it’s time as it often feels way longer than ninety minutes. There are moments of chemistry between the pair, and I did like the premise but the over-written and ponderous execution just left me disappointed, sorry.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.