Is Congo Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Congo is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Congo is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Adventure, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Congo is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1995, Congo emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Adventure, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Eight people embark on an expedition into the Congo, a mysterious expanse of unexplored Africa, where human greed and the laws of nature have gone berserk. Unlike standard genre fare, Congo attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Congo features a noteworthy lineup led by Laura Linney . Supported by the likes of Dylan Walsh and Ernie Hudson , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Congo (1995) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Congo is a Action, Adventure, Science Fiction film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The narrative structure follows a classic action blueprint: establish the protagonist's world, introduce a formidable antagonist, and escalate the stakes through increasingly intense confrontations. Eight people embark on an expedition into the Congo, a mysterious expanse of unexplored Africa, where human greed and the laws of nature have gone berserk. The film balances spectacular set pieces with character moments, ensuring the action serves the story rather than overwhelming it.
Ending Breakdown: Congo attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Congo reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $50.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $152.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Congo is $50.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, Congo stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1995 cinematic year.
Congo has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Congo is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Adventure, Science Fiction movies, but read reviews first.
Congo may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
The movie is very boring. A talking gorilla is pretty cool. I actually was about to shut the movie off cause it was that boring. Then all of a sudden the movie took a awesome turn at the end. It went from a family friendly boring movie to a horror show.
Now I'm usually a fan of Tim Curry but quite what he is doing in this rather weak and feeble hybrid of "Tarzan" meets "King Solomon's Mines" is anyone's guess. It's all about the search for a lost expedition that was being led by the son of an American industrialist who was seeking diamonds large enough to power a laser (ostensibly for communications purposes, but who really knows?). Anyway, they disappear so it falls to Curry and Laura Linney's "Dr. Rees" to follow the sagely guidance of the Quatermain-esque "Kelly" (Ernie Hudson) deep into the hostile terrain of the jungle. It's got just about everything required to make it flop, this film. Terrible acting, even worse dialogue - and that's just from the chatty gorilla that all too often saves the day - and some very cheap and cheerful CGI that merely serves to showcase the poor nature of this derivative and rather unremarkable effort. Curry ("Homolka") is just not at the races here and Linney brings very little by way of gravitas or to her over-scripted role neither. It's rated 12 - but perhaps that's referring to the maximum IQ of anyone whom they are hoping will watch? I wouldn't bother if I were you.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.