Is Contribution Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Contribution is likely a skip if you enjoy Mystery movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Contribution is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Mystery, History genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Contribution is likely a skip if you enjoy Mystery movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, Contribution emerges as a significant entry in the Mystery, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Perm, Siberia, 1918. Unlike standard genre fare, Contribution attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Mystery is often anchored by its ensemble, and Contribution features a noteworthy lineup led by Maksim Matveev . Supported by the likes of Ilya Noskov and Elizaveta Boyarskaya , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Contribution (2016) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Contribution is a Mystery, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Contribution attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to mystery resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Contribution reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Contribution draws heavily from documented historical records. As a mystery, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Contribution adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $3.7M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Contribution is $3.7M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










More TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, Contribution stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Contribution has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Contribution is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Mystery, History movies, but read reviews first.
Contribution is currently available for streaming on More TV. You can also check for it on platforms like More TV depending on your region.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.