Is Coriolanus Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Coriolanus is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 123 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Coriolanus is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Coriolanus is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 123 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2011, Coriolanus emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Caius Martius, aka Coriolanus, is an arrogant and fearsome general who has built a career on protecting Rome from its enemies. Unlike standard genre fare, Coriolanus attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Coriolanus features a noteworthy lineup led by Ralph Fiennes . Supported by the likes of Gerard Butler and Lubna Azabal , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Coriolanus (2011) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Coriolanus is a Drama, Thriller film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Coriolanus attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Coriolanus reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $7.7M |
| Worldwide Gross | $1.1M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Coriolanus is $7.7M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Lionsgate PlayAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, Coriolanus stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2011 cinematic year.
Coriolanus has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Coriolanus is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Coriolanus is currently available for streaming on Lionsgate Play. You can also check for it on platforms like Lionsgate Play depending on your region.
This reminded me a little of Sir Ian McKellen’s 1995 reimagining of “Richard III” as Ralph Fiennes turns his hand to directing this Shakespeare story of power-lust and betrayal. It’s maybe not the most famous of the bard’s works, nor for my money is it one of his most original. The story itself has shades of “Julius Caesar” too it as it depicts the rise and fall of the eponymous dictator (Fiennes). It all starts when the grain-deprived masses of the city take to the streets and their leader, who holds most of these plebs in utter contempt, finds himself unexpectedly deposed by the council - upon which sits his own mother (Vanessa Redgrave) - and shown the Appian Way. Disillusioned and furious, he enters into his own equivalent of a Faustian pact and swears allegiance to his bitterest enemy “Aufidius” (the seriously over-challenged Gerard Butler). What chance he can galvanise his new ally into helping him regain what he has lost - and, probably more consistently throughout this internecine web of deceit and suspicion, can anyone really trust anyone else to keep their promises? This does look good, and the assembled cast are extremely competent at delivering some of the poignant and thoughtful dialogue contained in this political tragedy, but I felt that perhaps too much of the nuance had to be condensed out of this necessarily abridged story, and somehow the fact that it wasn’t stage-bound lessened the intensity of the characterisations. Though she looked entirely natural in her pseudo-Fascist uniform, I felt Redgrave lacked for emotion as she performed and Fiennes over-compensated for that with plenty of intensely photographed opportunities for his nostrils to flare and his Adam’s Apple to agitate. As is so often the case with these adaptations, they can’t be as long as the original and so have to compromise. This one did a little too much of that for my liking. Still, if it encourages folk to read his works, then it is film well used.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.