Is Cosmopolis Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Cosmopolis is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Cosmopolis is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Cosmopolis is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2012, Cosmopolis emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Riding across Manhattan in a stretch limo during a riot in order to get a haircut, a 28-year-old billionaire asset manager's life begins to crumble. Unlike standard genre fare, Cosmopolis attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Cosmopolis features a noteworthy lineup led by Robert Pattinson . Supported by the likes of Juliette Binoche and Sarah Gadon , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Cosmopolis (2012) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Cosmopolis is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
This character-driven narrative explores the internal and external conflicts that define the human experience. Riding across Manhattan in a stretch limo during a riot in order to get a haircut, a 28-year-old billionaire asset manager's life begins to crumble. The screenplay takes time to develop its characters, allowing audiences to connect emotionally with their struggles and triumphs. Each scene builds upon the last, creating a cumulative emotional impact.
Ending Breakdown: Cosmopolis attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Cosmopolis reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $20.5M |
| Worldwide Gross | $6.1M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Cosmopolis is $20.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Starz Apple TV Channel
Starz Roku Premium Channel
Starz
Philo
Starz Amazon Channel
Amazon Video
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, Cosmopolis stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2012 cinematic year.
Cosmopolis has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Cosmopolis is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama movies, but read reviews first.
Cosmopolis is currently available for streaming on Starz Apple TV Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Starz Apple TV Channel, Starz Roku Premium Channel, Starz, Philo, Starz Amazon Channel depending on your region.
I really enjoyed this Cronenberg film. Though my favourite films of his are the incredible ones he did in my teens, during the 80's ('Videodrome', 'The Dead Zone' and 'The Fly' are nothing short of outstanding, and works that no one else could have come up with), he's really been thinking outside of the box for the past decade (even for a consistently interesting creature such as he), and it's only been recently, with both Sarah Polley and Denis Villeneuve emerging as vital directors, that his ranking as the greatest Canadian director ever has even had suitable competition for comparison. I remembered when this came out, and I believe a critic from 'The Globe and Mail' interviewed Cronenberg at its opening at Cannes, and he was almost apologetic about using Pattinson. It sounded like he didn't want to have to direct him. He made the excuse that he couldn't get funding for his projects from North America anymore, which is a dirty rotten shame, and had to go to Europe and Asia any time he wanted to make a film in order to have it bankrolled, and the Japanese insisted on star power to put moviegoers in the seats, and said there'd only be financial backing if Cronenberg directed Pattinson. This was my first experience watching the actor's work, and he did a fine job, no problem. The supporting cast was strong, with many of my favourite character actors of late, such as Paul Giamatti and Jay Baruchel. The script, co-written by Cronenberg, was a strong statement about just how out of touch the very rich are with the other 99% of us. I docked my mark by 1/10 because I was pissed off that Cronenberg degraded one of the finest actresses of our lifetime, Juliette Binoche here. I can't even talk about it. It was as difficult for me to tolerate as Spike Lee having Christopher Plummer call Jodie Foster something awful in the otherwise excellent 'Inside Man'. Lee's off my Christmas card list for sure this year, but Cronenberg being a fellow Canadian (I bet you thought I was going to say white, hahaha), I'll be less angry. But he better look over his shoulder if he tries something like THAT again. I was THAT close to crossing HIM off my Christmas card list too... I also remember from the time the film came out, an article and rating on the film (I think it was 'The Globe and Mail' as well, and by the same critic who had earlier interviewed him), saying that when he watched it, he watched a few teenage girls leaving the theatre (most probably because Pattinson was in it), saying it was the worst movie they had ever seen. That's the only evidence you need that this is a fine movie, well worth your time.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.