Is Creature Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Creature is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Creature is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Creature is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1985, Creature emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A crew of scientists arrives on a far, cold planet to examine archaic artifacts of unknown origin. Unlike standard genre fare, Creature attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Creature features a noteworthy lineup led by Stan Ivar . Supported by the likes of Wendy Schaal and Lyman Ward , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Creature (1985) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Creature is a Science Fiction, Horror film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Creature attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Creature reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $750.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Creature is $750.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
MGM+ Amazon Channel
MGM Plus
Philo
Fandor Amazon Channel
Screambox Amazon Channel
FlixFling
Midnight Pulp
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel
IndieFlix Shorts Amazon Channel
Apple TV
FlixFling
Amazon Video
Apple TV
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.6/10, and global collection metrics, Creature stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1985 cinematic year.
Creature is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.6/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.6/10, Creature may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Creature is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, fuboTV, MGM+ Amazon Channel, MGM Plus, Philo, Fandor Amazon Channel, Screambox Amazon Channel, FlixFling, Midnight Pulp, Amazon Prime Video with Ads, Midnight Pulp Amazon Channel, IndieFlix Shorts Amazon Channel depending on your region.
I notice that various people criticising the film for blatantly copying Alien but I say so what, for what it was I thought it was alright, I was never bored of the film and it did have an interesting plot. The film did make me laugh with how the doors sound in the film, the doors sounds like blaster firing from Star Wars so I thought that was definitely funny in a good way. However I did find two problems with this film, the first problem I found was that the Alien creature was very under-used, it didn't really appear much until the final act of the film so that was a wasted opportunity. The second problem is that the story and some scenes were a bit ropey, and there's some things I find a bit baffling in it but not to the point of being obnoxious. Even though people have discarded this film just because it's a low budget Alien clone but I say give it a chance because it's really not that bad.
Yeah it's an Alien rip off and the monster isn't as good. But there are a few things that it actually did better, as far as the characters went. The big lacking is the, well... Ripley made the Alien movies and you didn't have someone like her to stand out, you had neither a strong male nor a strong female lead... you didn't have any strong leads at all, and that. Wendy Schaal did a respectable job for the intended intelligent scream queen, but given it's an alien rip off you didn't want her to be a scream queen, you wanted her to be bad@$$. And, for a standard horror movie scream queen she did a great job... just you didn't want that in a movie like this after Alien set the standard. It was Klaus Kinski that stole the show and, unfortunately, they didn't let it ride on his back. He could have carried it if they gave him a longer role. He was fun to watch. But ultimately it fails for weakness in characters and no real worthy lead. But it was still entertaining, so 10 stars because... movies are made to entertain.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.