Is Crying Freeman Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Crying Freeman is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Crying Freeman is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Crime genre.
Answer: Yes, Crying Freeman is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1995, Crying Freeman emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A lethal assassin for a secret Chinese organisation, who sheds tears of regret each time he kills, is seen swiftly and mercilessly executing three Yakuza gangsters by a beautiful artist. Unlike standard genre fare, Crying Freeman attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Crying Freeman features a noteworthy lineup led by Mark Dacascos . Supported by the likes of Julie Condra and Rae Dawn Chong , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Crying Freeman (1995) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Crying Freeman is a Action, Crime film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Crying Freeman concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Crying Freeman reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Crying Freeman incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a action, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Crying Freeman adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $6.1M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Crying Freeman is $6.1M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Apple TV
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, Crying Freeman stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1995 cinematic year.
Crying Freeman has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Crying Freeman is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Crying Freeman may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
This is some pretty classic 90s, I love Mark Dacascos, and if you think you can sort of visualise in your head what a 1990s Mark Dacascos as an unwilling assassin with a mystic tattoo romancing a woman he was supposed to kill might look like, and go "Yeah that's what I like in a movie" then, well it is that, so sure, give it a try. But if you go "I only like good stories told in a three-act structure with human characters" then maybe don't. _Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.